Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWulansari, Anindya Dessi
dc.contributor.authorNovianto, Arif
dc.contributor.authorKeban, Yeremias Torontuan
dc.contributor.authorHernawan, Ari
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-06T04:01:39Z
dc.date.available2024-12-06T04:01:39Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-16
dc.identifier.issn2043-6874
dc.identifier.urihttp://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/21064
dc.description.abstractMainstream arguments hold that the digital gig economy has been a boon for countries with high levels of unemployment, and some have even deemed it the future of work. Online platform companies handling transportation, courier and food delivery services – such as Gojek, Grab and Maxim – have similarly built narratives that the drivers who become their partners will enjoy flexible working conditions. Using a structural analysis of flexible work mechanisms in the digital gig economy, this article explores the asymmetrical power of gig workers and online platform companies. Taking a post-positivist approach, the data in this research were collected through interviews with 290 platform drivers. The results show that the structural situation, wherein extensive reserves of labour exist and workers’ power is weak, has created a significant power asymmetry between gig workers and platform companies. The impact of this asymmetry of power makes the flexibility promised to gig workers a myth and actually increases precarity for workers.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSouth East Asia Researchen_US
dc.subjectDecent Worken_US
dc.subjectFlexible Worken_US
dc.subjectGig Economyen_US
dc.subjectPlatform Driveren_US
dc.subjectVulnerable Workersen_US
dc.subjectIndonesiaen_US
dc.titleHiding behind the platform: the myth of flexibility for gig workers in Indonesiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record