dc.contributor.author | Sasmita, Siska | |
dc.contributor.author | Kusumasari, Bevaola | |
dc.contributor.author | Pramusinto, Agus | |
dc.contributor.author | Susanto, Ely | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-01T22:46:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-12-01T22:46:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0024-9521 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/21202 | |
dc.description.abstract | Major studies in emergency decisions are focusing on how techno-rational approaches applied in early warning systems to produce an output; rarely explore its opponent, the naturalistic intervention, or how both paradigms function in a crisis decision process. This research aims to identify the actual process of emergency decision making in the context of natural hazard studies, whether it employs the techno-rational or purely naturalistic approach. A systematic review is adopted to assess papers in the period 2000-2018 within the ‘emergency decision making’ AND “natural disaster” keywords. Research finds a non-techno-rational paradigm that contributes to producing a decision outcome. Instead of categorizing it the naturalistic paradigm as named by the scholars, we labelled it a non-technological paradigm. It consists of two main instruments: individual and institutional interventions, that together with the techno-rational instrument develop an adaptive continuum behavior while operating in uncertainty condition in order to generate an effective evacuation order for vulnerable people. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Indonesian Journal of Geography | en_US |
dc.subject | adaptive | en_US |
dc.subject | continuum | en_US |
dc.subject | emergency decision making | en_US |
dc.subject | institutional intervention | en_US |
dc.subject | technorational paradigm | en_US |
dc.title | From solitary to an adaptive continuum process | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Toward a new framework of natural disaster emergency decision-making | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |