Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSasmita, Siska
dc.contributor.authorKusumasari, Bevaola
dc.contributor.authorPramusinto, Agus
dc.contributor.authorSusanto, Ely
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-01T22:46:27Z
dc.date.available2024-12-01T22:46:27Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0024-9521
dc.identifier.urihttp://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/21202
dc.description.abstractMajor studies in emergency decisions are focusing on how techno-rational approaches applied in early warning systems to produce an output; rarely explore its opponent, the naturalistic intervention, or how both paradigms function in a crisis decision process. This research aims to identify the actual process of emergency decision making in the context of natural hazard studies, whether it employs the techno-rational or purely naturalistic approach. A systematic review is adopted to assess papers in the period 2000-2018 within the ‘emergency decision making’ AND “natural disaster” keywords. Research finds a non-techno-rational paradigm that contributes to producing a decision outcome. Instead of categorizing it the naturalistic paradigm as named by the scholars, we labelled it a non-technological paradigm. It consists of two main instruments: individual and institutional interventions, that together with the techno-rational instrument develop an adaptive continuum behavior while operating in uncertainty condition in order to generate an effective evacuation order for vulnerable people.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIndonesian Journal of Geographyen_US
dc.subjectadaptiveen_US
dc.subjectcontinuumen_US
dc.subjectemergency decision makingen_US
dc.subjectinstitutional interventionen_US
dc.subjecttechnorational paradigmen_US
dc.titleFrom solitary to an adaptive continuum processen_US
dc.title.alternativeToward a new framework of natural disaster emergency decision-makingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record