| dc.contributor.author | Pankaj Chejara | |
| dc.contributor.author | Luis P. Prieto | |
| dc.contributor.author | Adolfo Ruiz-Calleja | |
| dc.contributor.author | María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shashi Kant Shankar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Reet Kasepalu | |
| dc.contributor.other | School of Digital Technologies, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia | |
| dc.contributor.other | School of Educational Sciences, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia | |
| dc.contributor.other | GSIC-EMIC Group, University of Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain | |
| dc.contributor.other | School of Digital Technologies, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia | |
| dc.contributor.other | School of Digital Technologies, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia | |
| dc.contributor.other | School of Educational Sciences, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-09T05:21:33Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-09T05:21:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 01-04-2021 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/8/2863 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/40977 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Multimodal Learning Analytics (MMLA) researchers are progressively employing machine learning (ML) techniques to develop predictive models to improve learning and teaching practices. These predictive models are often evaluated for their generalizability using methods from the ML domain, which do not take into account MMLA’s educational nature. Furthermore, there is a lack of systematization in model evaluation in MMLA, which is also reflected in the heterogeneous reporting of the evaluation results. To overcome these issues, this paper proposes an evaluation framework to assess and report the generalizability of ML models in MMLA (EFAR-MMLA). To illustrate the usefulness of EFAR-MMLA, we present a case study with two datasets, each with audio and log data collected from a classroom during a collaborative learning session. In this case study, regression models are developed for collaboration quality and its sub-dimensions, and their generalizability is evaluated and reported. The framework helped us to systematically detect and report that the models achieved better performance when evaluated using hold-out or cross-validation but quickly degraded when evaluated across different student groups and learning contexts. The framework helps to open up a “wicked problem” in MMLA research that remains fuzzy (i.e., the generalizability of ML models), which is critical to both accumulating knowledge in the research community and demonstrating the practical relevance of these techniques. | |
| dc.language.iso | EN | |
| dc.publisher | MDPI AG | |
| dc.subject.lcc | Chemical technology | |
| dc.title | EFAR-MMLA: An Evaluation Framework to Assess and Report Generalizability of Machine Learning Models in MMLA | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.description.keywords | Multimodal Learning Analytics | |
| dc.description.keywords | MMLA | |
| dc.description.keywords | face-to-face collaboration | |
| dc.description.keywords | machine learning | |
| dc.description.keywords | generalizability | |
| dc.description.keywords | evaluation framework | |
| dc.description.doi | 10.3390/s21082863 | |
| dc.title.journal | Sensors | |
| dc.identifier.e-issn | 1424-8220 | |
| dc.identifier.oai | oai:doaj.org/journal:a3bd79c39fa44a42b6691e9eb94023e1 | |
| dc.journal.info | Volume 21, Issue 8 | |