Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmr M. Ragheb
dc.contributor.authorWaddah S. Saif
dc.contributor.authorSaleh A. Alshebeili
dc.contributor.otherKACST-TIC in Radio Frequency and Photonics for the e-Society, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
dc.contributor.otherKACST-TIC in Radio Frequency and Photonics for the e-Society, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
dc.contributor.otherKACST-TIC in Radio Frequency and Photonics for the e-Society, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-09T05:26:05Z
dc.date.available2025-10-09T05:26:05Z
dc.date.issued01-04-2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2304-6732/8/4/129
dc.identifier.urihttp://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/41009
dc.description.abstractThis paper exploits for the first time the use of machine learning (ML) based techniques to identify complex structured light patterns under free space optics (FSO) jamming attacks for secure FSO-based applications. Five <i>M</i>-ary modulation schemes, construed using Laguerre and Hermite Gaussian (LG and HG) mode families, were used in this investigation. These include 8-ary LG, 8-ary superposition-LG, 16-ary HG, 16-ary LG and superposition-LG, and 32-ary LG and superposition-LG and HG formats. The work was conducted using experimental demonstrations for two different jammer positions. The convolutional neural network (CNN)-based ML method was utilized to differentiate between the stressed mode patterns. The experimental results show a 100% recognition accuracy for 8-ary LG, 8-ary superposition-LG, and 16-ary HG at 1, −2, and −2 dB signal-to-jammer ratios (SJR), respectively. For SJR values < 0 dB, the standard LG modes are the most affected by jamming and are not recommended for data transmission in such an environment. Besides, the accuracy of determining the jammer direction of arrival was investigated using CNN and a simpler classifier based on linear discriminant analysis (LDA). The results show that advanced networks (e.g., CNN) are required to achieve reliable performance of 100% direction determination accuracy, at −5 dB SJR, as opposed to 97%, at 2 dB SJR, for a simple LDA classifier.
dc.language.isoEN
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.subject.lccApplied optics. Photonics
dc.titleML-Based Identification of Structured Light Schemes under Free Space Jamming Threats for Secure FSO-Based Applications
dc.typeArticle
dc.description.keywordsfree space optics
dc.description.keywordsstructured light
dc.description.keywordsjamming
dc.description.keywordsmachine learning
dc.description.doi10.3390/photonics8040129
dc.title.journalPhotonics
dc.identifier.e-issn2304-6732
dc.identifier.oaioai:doaj.org/journal:d8f88f51447c405f87e1de5f5f2973d2
dc.journal.infoVolume 8, Issue 4


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record