Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStergios Statharas
dc.contributor.authorYannis Moysoglou
dc.contributor.authorPelopidas Siskos
dc.contributor.authorPantelis Capros
dc.contributor.otherSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, E3MLab, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Iroon Polytechniou Street, Zografou, 15773 Athens, Greece
dc.contributor.otherE3-Modelling SA, Panormou 70-72, 11524 Athens, Greece
dc.contributor.otherSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, E3MLab, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Iroon Polytechniou Street, Zografou, 15773 Athens, Greece
dc.contributor.otherSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, E3MLab, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Iroon Polytechniou Street, Zografou, 15773 Athens, Greece
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-09T05:31:45Z
dc.date.available2025-10-09T05:31:45Z
dc.date.issued01-04-2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2345
dc.identifier.urihttp://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/41129
dc.description.abstractIt is widely accepted that the market uptake of electric vehicles is essential for the decarbonisation of transport. However, scaling up the roll out of electric vehicles (EV) is challenging considering the lack of charging infrastructure. The latter is, currently, developing in an uneven way across the EU countries. A charging infrastructure with wide coverage addresses range limitations but requires high investment with uncertain returns during the early years of deployment. The aim of this paper is to assess how different policy options affect EV penetration and the involvement of private sector in infrastructure deployment. We propose a mathematical programming model of the decision problem and the interaction between the actors of EV charging ecosystem and apply it to the case of Greece from the time period until 2030. Greece represents a typical example of a country with ambitious targets for EV penetration by 2030 (10% of the total stock) with limited effort made until now. The results indicate that it is challenging to engage private investors in the early years, even using subsidies; thus, publicly financed infrastructure deployment is important for the first years. In the mid-term, subsidization on the costs of charging points is necessary to positively influence the uptake of private investments. These are mainly attracted from 2025 onwards, after a critical mass of EVs and infrastructure has been deployed.
dc.language.isoEN
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.subject.lccTechnology
dc.titleSimulating the Evolution of Business Models for Electricity Recharging Infrastructure Development by 2030: A Case Study for Greece
dc.typeArticle
dc.description.keywordselectric vehicles
dc.description.keywordselectricity recharging infrastructure
dc.description.keywordsbusiness models
dc.description.keywordsequilibrium programming
dc.description.keywordsGreek EV mobility 2030
dc.description.keywordsprivate investments in infrastructure
dc.description.doi10.3390/en14092345
dc.title.journalEnergies
dc.identifier.e-issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.oaioai:doaj.org/journal:e5107a198b5d4f769a16472c7f100fef
dc.journal.infoVolume 14, Issue 9


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record