Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFernando Cantalapiedra Erostarbe
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-09T05:31:51Z
dc.date.available2025-10-09T05:31:51Z
dc.date.issued01-01-2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://ojs.uv.es/index.php/celestinesca/article/view/20190
dc.identifier.urihttp://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/41131
dc.description.abstractAfter reviewing the development of the scholarly perceptions about the authorship of La Celestina in the last years, this article focuses on the subsets Mp-a and Mp-b of the Manuscrito de Palacio, particularly on the first one and some textual modifications of the second copyst. It states that they stem from different models and that the marginal glosses are in fact additions by the second copyst which end up in the printed text. This process was applied to the twelve acts that formed the primitive Terentian comedy. It also suggests some solutions for the loci critici «Minerva», «el can», «el cuchillo» and «huevos cocidos».
dc.language.isoEN
dc.publisherUniversidad de Valencia, Departamento de Filología Española
dc.subject.lccLanguage and Literature
dc.titleNotes on the Manuscrito de Palacio II-1520, marginal additions and philological controversies
dc.typeArticle
dc.description.keywordsautoría
dc.description.keywordsmanuscrito
dc.description.keywordsgrillos
dc.description.keywordsvela
dc.description.keywordsglosas
dc.description.keywordserasístrato
dc.description.keywordsantíoco
dc.description.keywordsplebérico
dc.description.keywordsminerva
dc.description.keywordscan
dc.description.keywordssimio
dc.description.keywordscuchillo
dc.description.keywordshuevos
dc.description.keywordscomadres
dc.description.pages9-52
dc.description.doi10.7203/Celestinesca.40.20190
dc.title.journalCelestinesca
dc.identifier.e-issn2695-7183
dc.identifier.oaioai:doaj.org/journal:f9887714f6f64092a054270cb3e56519
dc.journal.infoVolume 40, Issue 0


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record