| dc.description.abstract | ABSTRACT This thesis is an analysis of public policy based on research carried out in the Implementation of Kulonprogo RASDA Programme in 2015, as a new alternative offered to replace the Government RASKIN Programme that is already running. Research carried out aims to determine how the implementation of the RASDA Programme in Kulonprogo and to identify the factors that cause RASDA program is not run as expected. The method used in the study is a qualitative method using two types of data, primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques used were observation, interview, and documentation with informants selection technique using the principle of purposive and snowball technique. Data analysis technique is done through data reduction, data display and data verification. The results showed that efforts to re-design RASKIN Programme through RASDA program is still not successful. The achievement of programme output and outcome indicators are still far from expectations. Achievement 6 Tepat has not significantly improved, still encountered the same problem with the implementation of the previous RASKIN Programme. While farmers have not got benefited from the uptake of local rice that not maximized. There are several factors that cause RASDA Programme in Kulonprogro not optimal, namely: First, the conflict of the design concept of the programme with the realities that exist as a result of the logic that built in the concept difficult to realized, as seen from: (1) the rationality of farmers as the target programme "beat" benefit that will be gained; (2) the involvement of complicated political interests of elites in the process of policy formulation; (3) limited decision-making authority of local government in the National RASKIN Programme; and (4) the gap between the need for resources in concept to the factual conditions. Second, the conflict of interest in the disposition of the implementor that cause programme implementation does not synergistic, as seen from: (1) their efforts to make RASDA programme as a springboard for other purposes; (2) the apparent support of BULOG; (3) the attitude of apathy and lack of bureaucrats initiatives; and (4) the business logic that dominates entrepreneurs in Gapoktan. Third, has not noticed the characteristics of the target group in anticipation of problems that arise. Based on these findings, the researcher suggest the government to focus on improving the implementation mechanism of food subsidies has been running and look for other alternatives in upanya optimize the potential of local food and improving the welfare of farmers, by: (1) re-constructs the values and norms in the use of social sanctions to support the program with intensive socialization; (2) the budget provision in the APBD for the procurement of subsidized rice for poor households who are not registered; (3) increase the frequency of monitoring up to the lowest level; (4) encourages small entrepreneurs to become a Bulogs partner and seek access to capital; (5) maintain fair competition between rice businessmen; (6) conduct of studies into the possibility of establishing a regional company or a unit of integrated rice management; (7) encourage local rice product branding . | |
