Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUdasmoro, Wening
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-02T00:49:35Z
dc.date.available2026-06-02T00:49:35Z
dc.date.issued2012-08-08 00:00:00
dc.identifier.issn2302-9269
dc.identifier.issn0852-0801
dc.identifier.urihttps://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jurnal-humaniora/article/view/915
dc.identifier.uri10.22146/jh.915
dc.identifier.urihttp://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/85049
dc.description.abstractThis article attempts to analyse one of Jean Racine’s famous works entitled Phèdre using the feminist post-structuralist approach, which differs from earlier analysis of his dramas by others. As a classical work, Phèdre has frequently been analysed by many scholars using the structuralist approach, thus specifically concentrating on binary opposition synthesis. As a result, the dichotomous understanding of Phèdre has been produced, and in many instances shows the stereotypical effect of women in many aspects of their lives. In this analysis of Phèdre, the feminist post structuralist approach deconstructs that understanding and revealed that power relation is one of the important perspectives that can be used in illuminating meaning within the text.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFaculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada
dc.relation.urihttps://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jurnal-humaniora/article/view/915/762
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2012 Wening Udasmoro; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
dc.subject-
dc.titleKEKUASAAN DI ATAS PENTAS : LA TRAGÉDIE « PHÈDRE» DALAM PERSPEKTIF FEMINISME POSTSTRUKTURALIS
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.oaioai:jurnal.ugm.ac.id:article/915
dc.journal.infoHumaniora; Vol 20, No 1 (2008); 11-17


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record