Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYuda, Tauchid Komara (57201631933)
dc.contributor.editor-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-11T15:45:57Z
dc.date.available2025-02-11T15:45:57Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.isbn978-981992497-4; 978-981992496-7
dc.identifier.issnDF0013
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/9789819924974-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85165500268&doi=10.1007%2f9789819924974-7&partnerID=40&md5=bfd07fb533ceeb7cea96ac1fdad194e7
dc.identifier.urihttp://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/21422
dc.description.abstractThis article draws on an institutional approach to compare social policy responses and changes between the Asian Financial Crisis and the current Covid-19 Pandemic crisis in Indonesia. The two distinct crises led to distinct policy changes. First, during the Asian Financial Crisis, the response was to change two layers of social policy: social protection and health insurance due to emergency and uncertain situations. At the same time, the welfare institution, either state or informal network, to mitigate the crisis was inadequate. This social protection institution-alization was not conditioned as social rights and was pursued primarily due to clientelistic motives of politicians during competitive elections. Second, in contrast, during the Covid-19 crisis, the drastic change can be found only in labor market policies, which were restructured towards more flexible settings, driven by political interests embedded within a network of patronage that remains intact among oligarchs. Meanwhile, a non-insider had no real influence on policymaking. This illustrative case underscores the failure of democratization in empowering cross-class coalitions to promote a more protective welfare system against the influence of oligarchic power. Overall, the case of Indonesia offers an example of a welfare regime model firmly rooted in clientelism and moderately successful in the development of social welfare policies and programs. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023, corrected publication 2023.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherCovid-19 Pandemic: Problems Arising in Health and Social Policy
dc.titleComparing Social Policy Responses Between Separate Crises: Taking the Case of Indonesia
dc.typeBook chapter
dc.description.pages24.0
dc.description.doi10.1007/9789819924974-7
dc.title.book-
dc.link.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85165500268&doi=10.1007%2f9789819924974-7&partnerID=40&md5=bfd07fb533ceeb7cea96ac1fdad194e7


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record