Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSamuel, Hanneman (55869020300); Sutopo, Oki Rahadianto (55869361600)
dc.contributor.editor-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-11T16:06:49Z
dc.date.available2025-02-11T16:06:49Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.isbn-
dc.identifier.issn19112025
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n13p289
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84884858646&doi=10.5539%2fass.v9n13p289&partnerID=40&md5=9290247d987464732c5a2f4108d7cdab
dc.identifier.urihttp://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/21703
dc.description.abstractConceptualizations of modern Indonesia were active agents in shaping the way we saw the present Indonesia and its problems. This study is concerned with some major conceptions of modern Indonesia, namely, the primordial sentiments thesis, the transitional stage thesis, the historical structural thesis, and the cultural imperialism thesis. Our specific interest was on comparing the way they treated the Indonesian state and society. It is our argument that involvement of scientific knowledge in the formation of modern Indonesia had been a complex process: scientific knowledge intertwined with common sense in power relations. This had meant Indonesian societies and identities could never be considered to have been monolithic. © the author(s).
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherAsian Social Science
dc.titleThe many faces of Indonesia: Knowledge production and power relations
dc.typeArticle
dc.description.pages9.0
dc.description.doi10.5539/ass.v9n13p289
dc.title.book-
dc.link.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84884858646&doi=10.5539%2fass.v9n13p289&partnerID=40&md5=9290247d987464732c5a2f4108d7cdab


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Article
    Material for original research or scientific investigation

Show simple item record