Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTörnquist, Olle (6506902758); Hanif, Hasrul (57194197019); Hiariej, Eric (57189270424); Samadhi, Willy P. (57194189830); Savirani, Amalinda (56598550300)
dc.contributor.editor-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-11T16:09:23Z
dc.date.available2025-02-11T16:09:23Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.isbn-
dc.identifier.issn18681034
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/186810341703600105
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85019124305&doi=10.1177%2f186810341703600105&partnerID=40&md5=7f3cdf269e81aa28dfdcf07053e11448
dc.identifier.urihttp://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/21742
dc.description.abstractIndonesia is a critical case of liberal democratisation. Most of the country s old dominant actors were included in compromises aimed at democracy and were expected to become democrats by adjusting to the new institutions. The pro-democrats were expected to propel change from civil society. However, the recurrent participatory surveys and follow-up studies summarised herein point to remarkable freedoms, along with deplorable governance and representation. The major causes are biased institutions of representation, plus weak political capacity of the crucial actors of change within modern business and among the middle classes and labourers. Advances presuppose new ways to represent their interests. © 2017, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherJournal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
dc.titleThe downside of Indonesia s successful liberal democratisation and the way ahead. Notes from the participatory surveys and case studies 2000-2016
dc.typeNote
dc.description.pages15.0
dc.description.doi10.1177/186810341703600105
dc.title.book-
dc.link.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85019124305&doi=10.1177%2f186810341703600105&partnerID=40&md5=7f3cdf269e81aa28dfdcf07053e11448


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record