Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFiona C Giles
dc.contributor.authorMandy McKenzie
dc.contributor.authorMinerva Kyei-Nimakoh
dc.contributor.authorLata Satyen
dc.contributor.authorLaura Tarzia
dc.contributor.authorKelsey Hegarty
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-13T14:09:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-18T04:57:40Z
dc.date.available2026-05-18T04:57:40Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-13T14:09:57Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/20597991251333345
dc.identifier.urihttp://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/22075
dc.description.abstractAn increasingly common challenge facing researchers is participants falsifying their identity or their experiences to participate in online research. Imposter participants pose a threat to the integrity of research data, requiring careful risk mitigation strategies. In this case study report, we describe four projects across two institutions with victim-survivors and perpetrators of domestic, family and sexual violence in which we encountered imposter participants. We describe the technical, manual and ethical strategies we implemented to safeguard the integrity of our research. While necessary, these strategies were resource-intensive, and impacted participant recruitment and the wellbeing of researchers. We recommend a range of strategies at the study design, organisational and global level to better equip researchers with the tools to manage impost participants and maintain the integrity of data collected in research.
dc.publisherSAGE Publishing
dc.subject.lccSocial Sciences
dc.titleManagement of imposter participants when conducting online research with victim-survivors and perpetrators of violence
dc.typeArticle
dc.description.doi10.1177/20597991251333345
dc.title.journalMethodological Innovations
dc.identifier.oaioai:doaj.org/journal:7ec3ecf3c592492fb0335a7f40310edc


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record