Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPadmo, Soegijanto
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-23T06:43:17Z
dc.date.available2025-09-23T06:43:17Z
dc.date.issued2012-07-03 00:00:00
dc.identifier.issn-
dc.identifier.urihttps://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jurnal-humaniora/article/view/603
dc.identifier.urihttp://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/24844
dc.description.abstractWhen in 1974, a religious teacher tried to reopen a religious school in Kedung Turi Village, Plasa Sub-District which had been in operation in the northern area since the mid of the 19th century. Since there is no relation in many respects between the newly emerged kyai in Kedung Turi and the relatively settled-down older kyais of southern part, namely in Tebuirang, Tambakberas, and the surrounding villages, they declared that the kyai of Kedung Turi is not a genuine kyai. In this paper, an attempt is made to discover why the Kedung Turi religious school is considered as not a genuine pesantren and the kyai is not a genuine kyai and how it developed within period of relatively in relatively short period of time has been attracting so many followers.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFaculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada
dc.relation.urihttps://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jurnal-humaniora/article/view/603/393
dc.rights['Copyright (c) 2012 Soegijanto Padmo', 'http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0']
dc.subjectnan
dc.titleOral History Versus Oral Tradition
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.oaioai:jurnal.ugm.ac.id:article/603
dc.journal.info['Humaniora; Vol 10, No 1 (1998); 8-12', '2302-9269', '0852-0801']


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record