Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSantoso, Bagus
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-23T07:47:08Z
dc.date.available2025-09-23T07:47:08Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-30 00:00:00
dc.identifier.issn-
dc.identifier.urihttps://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jieb/article/view/6729
dc.identifier.urihttp://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/27055
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the teaching curriculum at the Faculty of Economics Gadjah Mada University and its future development. Better quality of teaching materials on quantitative as well as qualitative methods should be the final goal. Recently there were “talks” among faculty members to change the name of the faculty of economics to became Faculty of Economics and Business. This paper argues against the idea.Keywords: Neoclassical and Keynesian Economics, Economics Teaching.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFaculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada
dc.relation.urihttps://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jieb/article/view/6729/5282
dc.rightsnan
dc.subjectnan
dc.titleQUO VADIS PENGAJARAN ILMU EKONOMI?
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.oaioai:jurnal.ugm.ac.id:article/6729
dc.journal.info['Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business (JIEB); Vol 17, No 2 (2002): April', '2338-5847', '2085-8272']


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record