| dc.contributor.author | ['Widyastuti, Widyastuti', 'Claramita, Mora', 'Padmawati, Retna Siwi'] | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-23T10:36:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-23T10:36:09Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-12-09 00:00:00 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | - | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/rpcpe/article/view/41696 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/33239 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Communication is a basic skill that must be acquired by every doctor just like all other clinical skills. One of communication guidelines for doctor-patient that is the most widely used in many countries is the Calgary-Cambridge Communication Guideline (CCCG). However, since CCCG is based on the Western style of communications, a further study is necessary to determine whether CCCG is acceptable and applicable in Indonesia. Methods: This research was an analytic descriptive study with a cross-sectional design. The research was conducted from December 2016 until January 2017 in Yogyakarta with 58 primary care doctors. The data was collected using the CCCG-based questionnaire method with a cross-cultural adaptation. Results: The CCCG is well accepted although its application is not optimum. The acceptance rate was 4.03 (indicating highly acceptable), while the application rate was 3.74 (indicating occasionally implemented). There was a significant difference between the acceptance and application rates (p<0.01). There were no significant differences between the acceptance rates of Puskesmas (Community and Primary Health Care Center) and non-Puskesmas (p = 0.115) facilities while the application was significantly different (p = 0.001). The application levels of the Puskesmas were lower than those in non-Puskesmas. Additionally, there was no difference in the acceptance or application of CCCG for doctors who have and who have not attended communication training. Conclusion: There was no difference in the acceptance of CCCG, but there was a difference in its application. The application rate at Puskesmas was lower than non-Puskesmas facilities. The experience in communication training did not affect the acceptance and the application rates of CCCG. | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/rpcpe/article/view/41696/23152 | |
| dc.rights | ['Copyright (c) 2018 Widyastuti ., Mora Claramita, Retna Siwi Padmawati', 'http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0'] | |
| dc.subject | Acceptance; application; Calgary-Cambridge communication guidelines; Puskesmas; non-Puskesmas communication training | |
| dc.title | Study of Acceptance and Application of Calgary Cambridge Communication Guideline for Doctor-Patient Communication in Primary Health Care | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.identifier.oai | oai:jurnal.ugm.ac.id:article/41696 | |
| dc.journal.info | ['Review of Primary Care Practice and Education; Vol 1, No 3 (2018): September; 123-128', '2620-5572', '2613-943X'] | |
