Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJyotirmoy Sarker
dc.contributor.authorMichael Kim
dc.contributor.authorSamantha Patton
dc.contributor.authorPrzemysław B. Radwański
dc.contributor.authorMark A. Munger
dc.contributor.authorKibum Kim
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Pharmacy Systems Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago Chicago IL USA
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Pharmacy Systems Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago Chicago IL USA
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Pharmacotherapy University of Utah Health Salt Lake City UT USA
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Physiology and Cell Biology The Ohio State University Columbus OH USA
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Pharmacotherapy University of Utah Health Salt Lake City UT USA
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Pharmacy Systems Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago Chicago IL USA
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-06T04:20:14Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-08T08:28:07Z
dc.date.available2025-10-08T08:28:07Z
dc.date.issued01-08-2025
dc.identifier.urihttp://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/repo/handle/15717717/36037
dc.description.abstractBackground Icosapent ethyl (IPE) and omega‐3‐acid ethyl esters (docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]/eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA]) are approved as adjunct therapies to statins for reducing cardiovascular events in at‐risk patients. However, concerns remain regarding a potential link between IPE and atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared the risk of AF onset in patients who initiated IPE versus DHA/EPA as adjuncts to statin therapy. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental database in the United States. An active‐comparator, new‐user study design was applied. Adults diagnosed with dyslipidemia and receiving statin therapy who initiated IPE or DHA/EPA between January 2013 and June 2021 were identified. A propensity score–matched cohort was created using baseline demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and medication dispensing records, with exact matching on therapy initiation period. Patients were followed for up to 2 years while they were on IPE or DHA/EPA therapy to identify incident AF. Cumulative incidence was estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods, and risks between groups were compared using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results The propensity score–matched cohort included 17 635 participants, with a mean age of 55 years, and was predominantly men (65.4%). Over 2 years, the cumulative incidence of AF from IPE and DHA/EPA was 5.20% (95% CI, 4.62%–5.84%) and 4.07% (95% CI, 3.58%–4.62%) respectively, resulting in a hazard ratio of 1.21 (95% CI, 1.03–1.42). Conclusions These findings suggest that, in adult patients who are AF naïve, IPE may be associated with a higher risk of AF compared with DHA/EPA when used as add‐on therapy with statins.
dc.language.isoEN
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subject.lccDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
dc.titleComparative Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Onset in Statin‐Treated Patients Initiating Icosapent Ethyl and Omega‐3 Acid Ethyl Esters: A Retrospective Cohort Study
dc.typeArticle
dc.description.keywordsatrial fibrillation
dc.description.keywordsicosapent ethyl
dc.description.keywordsomega‐3‐acid ethyl esters
dc.description.keywordsretrospective cohort study
dc.description.doi10.1161/JAHA.124.038846
dc.title.journalJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
dc.identifier.e-issn2047-9980
dc.identifier.oaibdfbc86449ef44e7ae26c4d212d259e7
dc.journal.infoVolume 14, Issue 15


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record