ABSTRACT The study is a research of the analysis of the public policy implementation which concerns on the implementation of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in Pandak, Bantul regency in 2014. The purposes of this study were to investigate: (1) the implementation of the Family Hope Program (PKH), (2) the performance of the Family Hope Program (PKH) and (3) factors that influence the performance of the Family Hope Program (PKH) To investigate the implementation of the Family Hope Program in Pandak, the researcher try to analyze the stage process during its implementation.While to measure the performance of the Family Hope Program in Pandak, the researcher applied policy outputs indicators approach from Randall B. Ripley, it consists of indicators of access, scope, accountability, bias, promptness of service and suitability program needs. The research used a qualitative method by using primary data and secondary data. To collect the data, the researcher used observation, interview and documentary. To analyze the data, the researcher applied inductive data analysis. The implementation of the Family Hope Program in Pandak in 2014 has covered 1887 Very Poor Households (RTSM). PKH implementation consists of some the steps, those are:(1) determining the targets, (2) validating and preparing of the initial meeting, (3) the distributing of aid and clustering the participants of PKH,(4) commitments verification, and (5) updating the data. From the various stages taken, there is a problem related to the weaknesses of the validation process, that it is only administratively.The weak validation process makes the determination of the target program became less accurate. Based on the measurement of the policy output indicators showed that the output performance of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in Pandak is low, it can be seen from: 1) aspect of bias, as there still found economically established families be the members of PKH; 2) aspects of service delivery (promptness of service) as the late disbursement of financial aid, and 3) aspects of the sustainability of the program with the needs of the target group, the aid scenarios or the amount of aid considered to be unfair for each RTSM. The research results also showfive dominant factors toward the performance of the program, namely: 1) lack of communication with the government local village; 2)lack of data transparency of the PKH receiver targets; 3) limited available sources; and 4) the absence of mechanisms and rules that require the report of the fund use by RTSM; and 5) decreased compliance of RTSM in fulfilling the obligations under the rules of the program. According to these factors, there are some recommendations to increase the policy / program to be better, those are: (1) Improving the communication and involvement of government local village, (2) Increasing the data transparency of the PKH receiver targets; (3) there should be an audit of the available sources; (4) Social Ministry should issue a new rule and create control mechanisms related to the use of PKH financial aid by RTSM, and (5) optimization the functions and coordination of the supervisors with the local village government to increase the awareness of the poor society in fulfilling the specified obligations in the program. Keywords: Implementation of the program, the performance of the program, the Family Hope Program